Easter Island and Aliens - General Tiki

T tikitortured Member Huntington Beach Ca. Joined: Apr 08, 2004 Posts: 332	T tikitortured Posted posted on Mon, Oct 10, 2005 4:13 PM Captnkirk, I'm sensing your sarcasm (I hope so, cuz you're layin' it on pretty thick). But the flaw in your argument is this: Yes, it's true that MOST of the Moai are buried and therefore we cannot see any drag OR roll marks, however, these gigantic things were dragged OR rolled from as far as 12 miles away! Up and down hills, with no roads. Surely there would be some kind of permanent scarring of the ground. Also, unless the TIKIs you've seen in Hawaii or elsewhere wheigh up to 82 tons and were dragged OR rolled up to 12 miles, your analogy to the Moai doesn't work. And of course, the Empire State Bldg. was constructed on site and not up to 12 miles away and dragged OR rolled into place.

Captnkirk, I'm sensing your sarcasm (I hope so, cuz you're layin' it on pretty thick). But the flaw in your argument is this:
Yes, it's true that MOST of the Moai are buried and therefore we cannot see any drag OR roll marks, however, these gigantic things were dragged OR rolled from as far as 12 miles away! Up and down hills, with no roads. Surely there would be some kind of permanent scarring of the ground. Also, unless the TIKIs you've seen in Hawaii or elsewhere wheigh up to 82 tons and were dragged OR rolled up to 12 miles, your analogy to the Moai doesn't work. And of course, the Empire State Bldg. was constructed on site and not up to 12 miles away and dragged OR rolled into place.

Post #191609 by tikitortured on Mon, Oct 10, 2005 4:13 PM