I think it has reached a point where it bears discussion... - Tiki Carving

W wicked Member toronto Joined: Oct 07, 2005 Posts: 66	W wicked Posted posted on Mon, Nov 21, 2005 9:57 AM On 2005-11-21 09:40, Hakalugi wrote: On 2005-11-21 08:39, wicked wrote: TIKI as an art form should be accepted in whatever shape form the artist envisions it. If you don't like it that’s totally fine, however it does not make it any less artistic. Art is subjective there is no simple way to say that’s right & that’s wrong. Are you suggesting that anything goes? Are you saying that no matter what an artists produces, if the artist calls it "Tiki" then it is? Is there no style at all? Are you suggesting that because an abstract artist makes a portrait that is recognisably human it's not a portrait?

On 2005-11-21 09:40, Hakalugi wrote:

On 2005-11-21 08:39, wicked wrote:

TIKI as an art form should be accepted in whatever shape form the artist envisions it. If you don't like it that’s totally fine, however it does not make it any less artistic. Art is subjective there is no simple way to say that’s right & that’s wrong.

Are you suggesting that anything goes? Are you saying that no matter what an artists produces, if the artist calls it "Tiki" then it is? Is there no style at all?

Are you suggesting that because an abstract artist makes a portrait that is recognisably human it's not a portrait?

Post #199269 by wicked on Mon, Nov 21, 2005 9:57 AM