Ohana Hut purchasing ... Sold out, ...Order Instructions Update pg 1 - General Tiki

M MikeyTiki Tiki Socialite Portland, OR Joined: Sep 09, 2006 Posts: 128	M MikeyTiki Posted posted on Sat, Sep 16, 2006 12:33 PM On 2006-09-16 12:23, tikipedia wrote: Anyway, I hope that Hanford's decision to restrict Ohana Huts to those people who posted previously/joined prior to Sept. 9 will not lead to any trouble. In the litigious society we live in today, you can always find somebody, who had their offer recinded, claim a 'violation of verbal contract' deal, or some BS like that. It wouldn't be violation of a verbal contract, because it was all in writing. (Unless of course the admins go back in time and modify the posts and logs.) Am I going to sue because of this? No, even though I think there is a good possibility that I could win if I wanted to waste my money, and Hanford's, and Stuckie's on a law suit. Do I agree and think that changing the rules after the fact is fair and right? No. [ Edited by: MikeyTiki 2006-09-16 12:33 ]

On 2006-09-16 12:23, tikipedia wrote:
Anyway, I hope that Hanford's decision to restrict Ohana Huts to those people who posted previously/joined prior to Sept. 9 will not lead to any trouble. In the litigious society we live in today, you can always find somebody, who had their offer recinded, claim a 'violation of verbal contract' deal, or some BS like that.

It wouldn't be violation of a verbal contract, because it was all in writing. (Unless of course the admins go back in time and modify the posts and logs.)

Am I going to sue because of this? No, even though I think there is a good possibility that I could win if I wanted to waste my money, and Hanford's, and Stuckie's on a law suit. Do I agree and think that changing the rules after the fact is fair and right? No.

[ Edited by: MikeyTiki 2006-09-16 12:33 ]

Post #254852 by MikeyTiki on Sat, Sep 16, 2006 12:33 PM