Post #262754 by Tom Slick on Wed, Oct 25, 2006 5:32 PM

Thor, I agree it IS entirely up to ownership/Hanford or any other appointed administrators to make this decision. And I will not challenge the fact whether or not tiki is strong. I will challenge that ALL 3500+ Tiki Centralites do not use the board actively, that is the ONLY point I am trying to make.

Feelin' Zombified asked-
How do you define a "true" TC'er? Those that post one informative post per year? or someone who posts "Yeah Dude!! That's Cool!!1!! Put me on the list" 200 times per month?

If you read through my original message the first time, you would have seen that I am talking about the - 0(zero) post members who have been signed up since 2002. That is definately not an active account. - In fact, I think it is safe to say that an account that was signed up prior to 2005 and still has 0(zero) posts has no need holding an active account, once again only my opinion.

Afterall, you can "LURK" without signing up(I know,I did it for 2 years). Besides not leaving even an ( 1 )introduction message leads me to believe all of these types of accounts are NULL and VOID.

"TRUE TCr's" participate,period. Whether its 1 post a month or 1,000....not 0(zero) and have been on the memberlist since 2002.....Remember this topic is about eliminating the 0(zero) posters only(INACTIVE). What do the obvious "Active" members think? What does Hanford think?
I'm just curious because 5379 members is overly exaggerated and misleading.The Tiki Central world is big, but it isnt thaaat big :P