Post #262904 by Tom Slick on Thu, Oct 26, 2006 1:35 PM

On 2006-10-26 10:52, aquarj wrote:

I thought it was already established that Hanford wasn't interested in the do-it-himself option either (having written, "There's no way in hell I'm going to do that"). So I thought the question was already moot, and it was reasonable and on-topic to suggest another way for you to get the count you're after. After all, Monkeyman did his own count in the thread where he brought it up.
However, since you said you still want opinions about deleting accounts, I'm against it.

-Randy

As for the topic posted back in 2004...Well, this is sorta along the reason of this post...DIGGING and searching isn't very user friendly. I now realize that someone ALREADY made a similar post prior to mine back in 2004. If in certain instances, the site were void of invalid topics such as expired auctions, or "Can you identify this item?" that no longer supports the imagery, stuff would be ALOT easier to navigate, since there would be no more sorting through topic after topic to find if someone already asked the question. I do realize this is Hanford & Co. decision and it IS respected. This post was only a REQUEST made prior to "discovering" the 2 year old topic. Of course, if this board did delete certain outdated topics, this original message would have never been posted to begin with. And herein lies the problem!

And for the record, the last line you posted:

However, since you said you still want opinions about deleting accounts, I'm against it.

Thats all you had to say to begin with WITHOUT the jabs.