Post #333971 by Tiki Lion on Fri, Sep 21, 2007 9:31 AM

OK, pardon my slow uptake here.
Silly me for mistaking this win/lose debate for a discussion.

Here I was proposing an explanation for fiscal conservatism in light of a supportive group's suggesting an artist's popularity is fading, with possible negative effect on his income.

Let me see if I've got it right now: how's this:

$35,000 for one evening spent painting, times however many evenings spent painting that year, times a projected 30 year painting career is certainly a lot of money.
Just think: I could work 2, 3 evenings a year, become massively wealthy, and take the rest of my life off!

Is that more appropriate?

No thanks, I'll skip the measuring tape.