Post #442879 by thegreenman on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 6:06 AM

Thanks Ta...

one point - this is the original piece, not a lithograph as I first posted. I know nothing about painting, so I asked an art major. :) She pointed out the actual paint and brushmarks on the canvas.

So I wonder if this changes anything?

On 2009-03-27 05:54, tikiauction wrote:
i'm not an attorney but I do have some links to the publishing industry. One thing to consider is any copyright issue. My personal belief is that you should be ok. Works produced after 1910 or so are protected by the international copyright convention. However, US copyright law prior to the 1980s used to require an explicit declaration (i.e. copyright 1959 the acme tiki company) and renewal every 28 years. So if the print was from 1950s, you should be ok, if there is no explicit declaration on it.

All the same, many of the reproduced mugs and prints that you see from iconic tiki establishments and even defunct ones are licensed or at least claim to be.

In terms of getting a print out. It depends on 2 things, the condition/quality of your original, and the quality of the copies you want. If you want to make art quality prints, you have to submit proofs and pay for color seperation and any additional processing. Even if your print looks pristine, bear in mind that the original proof that your print was made from was likely higher quality than what you have, so even in order to produce an identical quality print you will need to have post-processing. There will be a minimum order (usually at least in the 100s) even for limited art prints. The investment may not be unreasonable since limited prints are themselves valuable.

Hope this helps!