Beyond Tiki, Bilge, and Test / Bilge / The Artist : Why sometimes they are A**holes?
Post #536965 by Tipsy McStagger on Wed, Jun 16, 2010 9:06 PM
TM
Tipsy McStagger
Posted
posted
on
Wed, Jun 16, 2010 9:06 PM
yes- anyone can paint like pollack but that's never been the point. The point is that prior to him, no one did paint like that and that is why his work is signifigant for that time as with most pop artists. Anyone can paint campbell's soup cans but prior to warhol, no one did.....these artists and more helped expand the cultural and social boundaries of what was considered art. Duchamp made his audience view everyday objects we take for granted as potenial works of art when taken out of their everyday context (i.e a porcelian urinal). most folks tend to confuse substance with aesthetics when viewing these types of things but these artists and others of the time were ground breakers in their own ways.....important culturally for the doors they opened with their art, not neccessarily for the type of art they made..... |