Post #564766 by christiki295 on Fri, Nov 12, 2010 1:04 PM

On 2010-10-30 14:45, Atomic Tiki Punk wrote:
martian-tiki, while I like this thread, I think it just crossed from titillation to pornographic
which in "my opinion only", in Tikiland there is a line between Sexy & Sleazy
and things just got sleazy.

I don't believe I have a right to tell you what you can & cannot post & I don't believe in censorship or am I a prude, I just think this may be a bit much for Tiki Central & that is all I will say about it.

just my 5 cents,(Inflation)

My personal opinion is that we don't need a "Bright line" test for such subjective issues and that "it is all good" as it has at least a tangential reference to 60s erotica. In addition, there is a warning of nudity & erotica posted in the heading (which serves the dual purpose of advertising something really "juicy" inside, as well.)

BTW, the US Supreme Court had a difficult time defining such matters.
In Miller v. California, the US Supreme Ct discussed the 3-pt test of no literary, scientific or literary value, and appealing to the purient interest, in order to be obscene and not protected by the 1st Amendment.

[ Edited by: christiki295 2010-11-12 13:07 ]