ATP
Joined: Jul 19, 2009
Posts: 7118
|
ATP
On 2013-07-08 06:01, Choptop wrote:
the problem I have with it is several self appointed lords telling the rest of us what is and isnt "art". and to say that its only "art" if some past master had worked in the media or used a particular kind of paint is pretty ludicrous. Thanks, now I no longer have to worry about your self appointed status as arbiter of what is and what isnt "art".
Choptop, I am one man with one opinion, why are you so threatened by that?
and to the point you have made it very personal, I am not talking for the world, nor Tiki Central
I am not the "Art Police" and I am just talking for myself.
Do you always go ballistic when someone does not share your point of view?
seriously, go glitter up your entire house, no one here is saying you can't
but are you complaining that we don't have the right to not like it? or voice that point of view?
If someone did a custom "Glitter" paint job on a 1957 Panhead (and many folks do) I would criticize it, so I am purist!
get over it already.
And to quote an old Biker buddy of mine:
"If you shit your pants everytime someone says something you don't like, you will go broke buying new underwear"
|
