Post #71388 by DawnTiki on Wed, Jan 21, 2004 10:22 AM

Tiki_Bong you are totally right. It would seem like I have broken some of the rules of the Grand Member code of conduct. WTF wasn't the nicest or most intelligent statement I could have used. I want to thank SugarCaddyDaddy and the others for trying to put a positive spin on this thread. But when I originally wrote about "the hat" in December (which was ignored, not one person was impressed with the hat enough to comment about it at all a month ago). There wasn't any Grand Mystery Member code of conduct rules to break then. And gustw wasn't a TC member yet, so no ones feelings were hurt. I hadn't and still haven't insulted anyone person or called anyone any names. Where the implication that I was acting scholarly or a Tiki Historian (Yea, thats me) came from I don't know. Or why he said that I implied his design was sacrilege and that he had desecrated sacred Tiki culture is all beyond me. I said none of those things. Implied none of those things. All I said was WTF, and I thought his hat was stupi...well you know. Believe me if I wanted to say those things I would have. On the subject of the design of the hat, well, I didn't have to say anything. It speaks for itself. It was a waste of my time and everyone elses to have brought it up in the first place. Lesson learned :) . So, I want to apologize to all the Tiki Central members for not keeping on the high road.

[ Edited by: DawnTiki on 2004-01-21 11:36 ]