Tiki Central / General Tiki
1950 Trader Vic's article
Pages: 1 4 replies
E
exotica59
Posted
posted
on
Thu, Apr 20, 2006 6:24 AM
Last week while thumbing through some stuff at a antique store, my husband came across an article from the Aug. Holiday magazine from the 1950's. "The place is awash in atmosphere in the form of ship model, shark jaws, ships in bottles, tropical sponges, whalers' harpoons, fish nets and exotic dragons in porcelain. Chinese idols, and Buddha’s, Alaskan totem poles and coco matting from the South Seas. There are lanterns from old sailing ships, spars and anchors, and coils of hawser, and there are the inevitable souvenirs of the most recent wars, in the form of rifles, shell cases, fragmentation bombs, and service insignia.. I was wondering where are the tiki's? Did the author just forget to mention them--or is this pre-tiki yet? Did he add tiki's later and remove the military stuff ( fragmentation bombs?!) at some point? |
OL
ookoo lady
Posted
posted
on
Thu, Apr 20, 2006 7:07 AM
Was the article about a particular Trader Vic's, or all of them? |
E
exotica59
Posted
posted
on
Thu, Apr 20, 2006 7:20 AM
gosh, I'm sorry the Oakland address. "Whenever a customer disappeared inside, the waiters, barmen, and other interested parties set up a deafening clamor with pots, glasses, trays of dishes and other sources of tumult. Sounds like it was a fun time! You see things and say, Why? But I dream things that never were, and say, Why not! [ Edited by: exotica59 2006-04-20 11:54 ] |
E
exotica59
Posted
posted
on
Thu, Apr 20, 2006 12:05 PM
Another question. Did Hinky Dinks become the Oakland Trader Vic's on the same plot? |
B
bigbrotiki
Posted
posted
on
Thu, Apr 20, 2006 5:10 PM
If you look at the rendering of Hinky Dinks and Trader Vic's next to it on BOT page 82 you can see they are the same structure. As often in midcentury architectural renderings, the people are shown smaller than they really would look, to make the building more impressive. And in 1950 there was only one other Trader Vic's, the Seattle Outrigger. And yes, 1950 is technically still Pre-Tiki, and even though there were a few Tikis around (see B&W photo at bottom of page 82), they did not dominate. This is probably what the writer refers to as "Alaskan totem poles", showing again that "Tiki" had not become a commonly used term by then. [ Edited by: bigbrotiki 2006-04-20 17:13 ] |
Pages: 1 4 replies