Tiki Central / Collecting Tiki
Is this a bird?
Pages: 1 23 replies
T
tetwilson
Posted
posted
on
Fri, May 2, 2014 5:10 PM
I think this is a Witco-anyone familiar with it? I'm guessing it's some sort of bird.
[ Edited by: Bora Boris - Straightened images. - 2014-05-05 20:38 ] |
ATP
Atomic Tiki Punk
Posted
posted
on
Fri, May 2, 2014 5:32 PM
It does look like a Witco or one of the knock off companies |
M
MadDogMike
Posted
posted
on
Fri, May 2, 2014 6:49 PM
Ostrich? |
B
bigbrotiki
Posted
posted
on
Sun, May 4, 2014 10:16 PM
What you have there is a genuine PROTO-WITCO ! Until now, I considered myself the only lucky owner of such early Witco work. Here is the very first page of the very first hacked wood art that Witco ever offered: …and here is my piece: …which is clearly the lady on the right of P2: And now you own one of the P4 birds - even says so on the back!: Congrats! |
ATP
Atomic Tiki Punk
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 12:27 AM
So it's a P4 bird! |
B
bigbrotiki
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 7:22 AM
For the avid Witco student: WHAT does the P4 bird remind you off, and why does it make sense for it to be a Witco? |
T
tikiskip
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 7:51 AM
Ok I think this is wrong. |
B
bigbrotiki
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 9:41 AM
Close, but no ceegarr, Skip :) Those Witco students who have ardently studied the Witco TEXTBOOK entitled "TIki Modern" might recall the pages 174/175: Here we learned that William Westenhaver initially wanted to be a cartoonist, and lo and behold, his first characters were birds. So the P4 bird (and on the catalog page, the P1 figures for another example) is a fine example of a DRAWING having taken the shape of a CARVING - much like some of the the later Witco carvings that seem oddly "wrong" as 3D sculptures - BECAUSE they were 2D drawings simply "retraced" with a chainsaw. |
G
GROG
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 10:00 AM
Not tiki. :D |
B
bigbrotiki
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 10:20 AM
It is always so rewarding when the only reactions to one's efforts are remarks such as above. |
CAA
Chip and Andy
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 10:44 AM
Its not a plane. Its not Superman or Underdog. :wink: |
T
TikiTacky
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 11:15 AM
I always appreciate your research and knowledge. I've missed your posts lately, but assumed you're working on a new and exciting book. |
B
bigbrotiki
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 11:21 AM
Just got done and thought I check in by posting something informative and productive - how silly of me. |
G
GROG
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 11:40 AM
You did good. Informative. On topic. And entertaining. Glad to see you posting again when so many people have gone to f##kbook. (But GROG did U-mod vote for this to be moved to Beyond Tiki.) [ Edited by: GROG 2014-05-05 11:40 ] |
B
bigbrotiki
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 11:44 AM
THANKS Ernie, how kind. Have fun weeding through all the Witco posts for non-Tiki material, then. |
G
GROG
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 12:09 PM
Actually, there weren't that many miscategorized, so it didn't take long. |
ATP
Atomic Tiki Punk
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 2:16 PM
I just saw a whole flock of P4 birds fly over! |
T
tikiskip
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 7:35 PM
I do have TIki Modern and the Book of Tiki but missed that part. And I like the mystery tiki question things on TC. But then witco animals art is not as tiki as say Starwars or legos or bacon or pie.:) |
B
bigbrotiki
Posted
posted
on
Mon, May 5, 2014 7:56 PM
But understanding how WITCO art (including a lot of Tiki art) was being conceived, by going back to its beginnings - would that maybe be of interest to the Tiki collector? Maybe…just maybe? |
A
aquarj
Posted
posted
on
Tue, May 6, 2014 1:27 AM
Yep, I thought that was of interest. Actually that bird (P4 and the drawing) reminded me of another midcentury bird - not quite the same lineage, but maybe not that far stylistically. By Neil Jacobe from a poster for Douglas Aircraft, 1965. -Randy |
T
tikilongbeach
Posted
posted
on
Tue, May 6, 2014 8:14 AM
It looks like a giraffe to me. |
M
moondoggie
Posted
posted
on
Tue, May 6, 2014 8:52 AM
Well, it's interesting to ME. Although I will have to reread Tiki Modern since I failed the quick quiz. I particularly like the modernist witco art such as 'Birds' partly shown in bigbrotiki's post above but have respect for the more primitive stuff too. |
B
bigbrotiki
Posted
posted
on
Tue, May 6, 2014 11:22 AM
Thanks guys…it was more a rhetorical question directed towards the nitpicking ignorance of Grog, who as an animator should have displayed more insight about the broader meaning of art and its origins. |
G
GROG
Posted
posted
on
Tue, May 6, 2014 12:38 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolution/9331903/Earliest-cave-art-was-abstract.html |
Pages: 1 23 replies