F
Joined: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 1002
|
F
On 2008-08-25 20:50, beadtiki wrote:
I guess I am in the wrong here. However, in my defence, the original poster of these comments led me to belive that the "kid", who started out as a fat 14 year old with a mohawk and zombie make-up, which led me to believe he was an attendees offspring, is actually a 17+ year old "adult" who is supposedly near drinking age(?)and crashed the party with X-number of friends, as evidenced by his/their lack of wrist bands. THIS puts a different light on the subject entirely. I will wait, in the future, for 50 TCers to post their comments before I add my own - that way I will have all the "facts" before I attempt to defend someone - should they need or deserve it. Man - you either have to pussy-foot around here all the time or else be a complete jerk. Either way I lose - oh well - that's life and it won't keep me from posting!
In other words, the Stinker wasn't a members' kid so nevermind the attempt to shame the complainant.
[ Edited by: floratina 2008-08-25 22:43 ]
|
